There are plenty of terms and metrics used to measure a project’s tokenomics, often with their own methodology for measuring certain aspects of them, which can cause plenty of confusion. This is further complicated by the fact that certain terms are accidentally used interchangeably or can have a different definition or interpretation depending on the user or reader of it.
“Circulating Supply” is a great example of this.
Circulating Supply (CS) is defined by CoinGecko as: "The amount of coins that are circulating in the market and are tradeable by the public."
Below we have outlined a few different potential interpretations of Circulating Supply using different calculation methodologies:
Token distribution is done programmatically based on Cosmos' Vesting Accounts. Every vesting wallet receives their tokens at the outset but they are locked natively and automatically vest and unlock.
This explains why vested tokens are not automatically shown as Circulating Supply, since tokens are distributed in advance, they are automatically vested and unlocked, and are not moved between accounts. Here's an example to illustrate how it works.
Token holder
Receives 1 million tokens with a vesting period of 2 years into a Cosmos SDK genesis account
Can see their wallet with 1 million tokens but can't move tokens (no transfer/sell)
Tokens start vesting on a block-by-block basis (in the case of continuous vesting accounts)
Can stake or vote with their entire balance
Can only transact tokens once they are vested
We decided to distribute the tokens and automate its release as it is far more efficient, secure, and precise than the alternatives, e.g. there is no need for smart contracts which can be vulnerable, or manual distribution which is effort intensive and inefficient. We save our team precious time that can be better spent elsewhere, i.e. not spending days unlocking and transferring tokens.
Interpretation:
CoinGecko (CG) & CoinMarketCap (CMC)
Amended CG & CMC - (our preferred approach)
Maximum potential CS plus rewards minus internal account “vested” tokens
Maximum potential circulating supply
Calculation methodology
Total supply minus
Any balances held in following accounts:
Private sale
Ecosystem / Bounty / Marketing / Operations / Airdrops
Masternodes / Staking
Team / Foundation / Treasury / Escrow
CG & CMC methodology plus
Additional purchases, and
Staking rewards minus
Tokens burnt
Maximum potential circulating supply minus
“Vested” tokens in
Foundation
Community & grants
Contributors - Team
Advisors
Number of vested tokens plus
New tokens generated by inflation minus
Vested tokens burnt (if any)
Calculation Date as at 9th Jan 2023
$CHEQ
183,875,880
225,373,025
324,134,725
521,670,980
% of total supply
17.4%
21.4%
30.7%
49.5%
Note
A private investor purchasing additional tokens off secondary markets erroneously reduces CS when it should have no impact.
This calculation fixes the issue created by the blunt approach adopted by CG and CMC.
These are all vested tokens but excluding any accounts that are internal or non-public accounts which are not expected to come onto the circulating supply in the same way as other accounts i.e. treasury, team, and advisors.
This shows the theoretical maximum circulating supply. \ \ For $CHEQ, this calculation works from the vesting schedules published in cheqd’s Tokenomics Part 2, see full breakdown below.
Calculation date: 9 Jan 2023
#
% of current total supply
CG & CMC
183,875,880
17.4%
Amended CG & CMC - (our preferred)
216,977,964
20.6%
Max potential CS plus rewards minus internal account “vested” tokens
324,134,725
30.7%
Maximum potential CS plus rewards
520,797,484
49.4%
